Welcome, reader!  Did you enjoy Maus?  Let us know what your thoughts are.  If you're not sure what to say, have a go at a few of the questions below:

  1. What is Speigelman's purpose in writing Maus? Is he motivated by history?  By art?  By family obligation?  By ambition?
  2. What does Spiegelman benefit from using the graphic  form to accomplish that goal? Where do you see evidence of this in the book?  Where and why does it succeed?  Where and why does it fail?
  3. What makes this form particularly successful or unsuccessful at telling a holocaust narrative? How does it compare to famous holocaust narratives produced in other forms, such as the film Schindler's List or The Diary of Anne Frank?
  4. Do the animals used to represent different nations -- French frogs, Jewish mice, German cats, Polish Pigs, American Dogs, Swedish stags -- work metaphorically? What is the effect of that visual simplification?
  5. To what degree is Vladek's survival based on luck versus skill, character or other merit?  What message does this send?
  6. Spiegelman tells us that Vladek’s second wife Mala was a survivor too, like most of his parents’ friends. Why does Spiegelman call Mala a survivor? What does it mean to be a survivor?
  7. What kind of relationship does Spiegelman have with Vladek? Is it healthy? Why or why not? Could a relationship like this improve as time goes on? Why
  8. Vladek embodies miserly tendencies and other negative Jewish stereotypes that make Spiegelman uncomfortable. Why does he have these traits? Why doesn't Spiegelman edit them out?
  9. Why does Anja kill herself? Particularly, why does she do so after surviving the camps?
  10. Why is the suicide section of the book so different visually? How do you interpret the details of those differences? (The hands, the black trim, the use of actual human figures and a photograph.)
Pamela Snyder-Gallagher
2/26/2013 06:30:03 am

I liked the book. I thought that it would've been more disturbing, believe it or not, since it dealt with the holocaust. But it is because of this that I think that it was such a success. The narrator told his story as he remembers it (through the tellings of his father), and you realize that events happen so suddenly that there is really no time to think things through properly--which is what must've happened to so many during that horrific time. You do what you can to survive, and then just hope for the best.

It is funny, since both my husband and brother-in-law said that they read the "Maus" graphic novel during the early '90's when it was first published and both said that they remember liking it also. I am not a fan of graphic novels, but I feel as if it read like a regular book. I say this because I would think that the graphics would tell the story partially without even looking at the words, but with this book the text was pretty complete. With proper characterization coming through with the father and his "quirks" as an old man and the the various side characters being developed (the drawings of the "mice" made everyone seem very similar) so, in other words, characterization did come out through the text. I think that the book did leave you with a "cliffhanger" sort of feeling, but I am not dying to read the next book. This may be because I know through history what happens to a lot of people. My husband and brother-in-law said that they could not remember which book they like better--so I assume that they are very similar, just a continuation.

As an aside, I was disturbed by a part in the text where the "cats" were taking the "mice's" children and grabbing them by the feet and knocking them up against walls, which I did not like, but cannot argue against including this since it is a narrative about one person's telling about a very low point in the history of humankind.

Reply
Leticia Seaton
3/1/2013 09:30:57 pm

I was nervous when I first received the graphic novel and realized there was a big swastika on the front cover. Things like the holocaust and slavery are sensitive subjects and I was just hoping that it didn't strike all the wrong cords or try to be too humorous and lose the whole essence of what the holocaust means to so many people. This graphic novel was brilliant. It hit all the right notes and made it seem like someone was telling their story while still seeming to give facts about what really happened. I think pieces like this are great for those who do not really know anything about what happened back then in Germany. I found the relationship between Vladek and his father quite amusing. You could tell they had love for each other but their love was quite awkward because of the fathers unusual ways of doing things. I'm sure every child can say that there is something about their parent(s) that may rub them the wrong way and this addition to the story made the story seem authentic. Really a great read and would not be hesitant if the opportunity for the continuation appears.

Reply



Leave a Reply.